HendriksWealth
Registered commodity trading advisor · NFA ID 0576157

A systematic approach
to Nasdaq futures.

Hendriks Wealth Management applies institutional-grade methodology to a single, highly liquid market — NQ and MNQ Nasdaq-100 futures — for qualified investors who appreciate disciplined process over discretionary instinct.

Trading futures involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

01 — methodology

A divergence thesis.

The Nasdaq-100 is a concentrated index. Roughly half of its weight sits in seven names. When the futures contract diverges from the price action of those weights, the divergence carries information — and our system is built to read it.

02 — regulation

Registered and examined.

Registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a Commodity Trading Advisor. Member of NFA, subject to its regulatory oversight and periodic examinations. Verifiable through NFA BASIC.

03 — transparency

Full disclosure, every time.

A Disclosure Document, prepared in accordance with NFA Compliance Rule 2-13 and CFTC Regulation 4.34, is delivered to every prospective client before engagement. No engagement proceeds without it.

The approach

Multiple strategies.
One market.
One thesis.

The Hendriks Wealth Program is an ensemble — several complementary algorithms, each engineered for a different market regime, all tuned to the same underlying behaviour: the relationship between the Nasdaq’s heaviest weights and the underlying futures contract.

One market means one set of microstructure dynamics to master. One thesis means every strategy reinforces the others rather than diluting them. The result is a research programme that compounds on itself, year after year.

Read the methodology in full →
The signal, illustrated

When the index diverges from its weights, the gap is information.

The futures contract derives its value from the Nasdaq’s heaviest constituents. When the two move in concert, there is little to do. When they pull apart, a window opens.

DIVERGENCETT + NINDEX FUTURESUNDERLYING WEIGHTS
The principal

Built by a
practitioner.

Hendriks Wealth Management is led by its founder and Principal, Mark C. Hendriks — a Series 3 registered AP whose career in the futures industry spans decades.

His research has been patient. The thesis at the core of the Hendriks Wealth Program has been developed across many years and refined into the production infrastructure that now runs the firm.

Read the full background →
NAPLES, FLORIDA26.14° N · 81.79° WGULF OF MEXICO · FIRST LIGHT
From Naples

A boutique firm, located somewhere specific.

Hendriks Wealth Management is based in Naples, Florida. We are reachable directly, and we prefer it that way.

Recent commentary

Notes from a working desk.

Two notes a day, every trading day. Pre-market framework before the open; market note after the close. Educational commentary; the firm does not discuss its positions or trading activity here.

Post-close note
June 12, 2026

Post-close note — June 12, 2026

MARK'S CLOSE REPORT: A session that travelled without conviction: compressed volatility, a wide TICK range that resolved near neutral, and an index drifting above its volume-weighted mean without committing to it.

A session that moved without going anywhere

Friday closed the way much of the week had traded: with motion that did not accumulate into direction. The index spent the day above its volume-weighted average but never far enough above it to suggest the move was being defended. By the last hour, the spread between the short- and intermediate-term moving averages had narrowed to something close to a rounding error, and trend strength — measured by the usual directional indices — sat in the range one associates with chop rather than conviction. Momentum oscillators finished the day near the midpoint of their range. None of these are individually remarkable. Taken together, they describe a tape that was working, but not deciding.

Implied volatility drifted slightly lower into the close, finishing in the high teens — a level that has now persisted long enough to be the background condition rather than a story. Realized volatility, for its part, was concentrated in shorter intervals: brief expansions inside otherwise narrow ranges, the signature of a market in which participants are reacting locally without changing their broader stance. The intraday TICK swung across a wide band — meaningful negative excursions early, meaningful positive ones later — before settling near zero. A wide range that closes neutral is not the same as a quiet day. It is a day in which both sides showed up and neither left with the tape.

Breadth told a similar story. Advancers held a modest edge over decliners through the session, eroding somewhat into the close. Participation was real but not broad enough to call the day a thrust, and not weak enough to call it distribution. The index drifted; the underlying names drifted with it; the relationship between the two stayed within its recent character.

The rate backdrop, and what the week leaves behind

Ten-year yields ticked higher in the afternoon, with the long end firming modestly while the futures complex held steady. That is the kind of small divergence that tends to matter only in retrospect — either it was noise, or it was the first sign that the rate environment is preparing to do something the equity tape has not yet priced. The week as a whole has been one of compressed ranges across asset classes, and compression of that kind is information of its own sort. It does not tell you what comes next. It tells you that the market is waiting on something it has not yet been given.

The question for the coming week is whether the regime everyone has been treating as the default — low implied volatility, narrow daily ranges, indecisive breadth — continues to hold, or whether one of the inputs the market has been ignoring stops being ignorable. Rate-sensitive sectors and the long end of the curve are where we would expect the first hints. Whether they arrive is a different matter.

There is a temptation, on days like this one, to read the absence of a clear story as the absence of a story. It rarely is. Quiet sessions are where positioning gets rebuilt and where assumptions get tested without anyone announcing the test. The tape said little today. That is itself something to have noticed.

Pre-market framework
June 12, 2026

Pre-market framework — June 12, 2026

MARK'S MORNING CALL: A trending tape into Friday with implied volatility refusing to compress, and a rate complex that has gone quiet at the wrong moment.

The week is ending the way it was set up to end: with an index tape that has been pressing higher day after day, breadth that has been participating without enthusiasm, and a volatility surface that refuses to do what a trending market is supposed to make it do. Yesterday's close left the major equity index futures extended against their shorter-term moving averages by an amount that, in a different regime, would have been described as stretched. In this regime, it has simply been described as Tuesday, then Wednesday, then Thursday.

The overnight session has not disturbed any of that. Treasuries traded in a range narrow enough to suggest the rates market has, for now, decided it has nothing to add. Ten-year yields sit roughly where they sat at yesterday's cash close. The dollar has been quiet. Asia closed mixed and Europe is drifting. None of this is information, exactly, but the absence of information at the end of a strong week is itself a structural fact worth marking.

The volatility tell

What is more interesting is what implied volatility has been doing, or rather what it has been declining to do. The VIX sits in the middle of its trailing range — neither alarmed nor asleep. In a tape that has trended cleanly higher on rising breadth, the standard expectation would be for the volatility surface to compress materially. It has not. The front of the curve has held a bid that does not match the price action above it.

There are a few honest readings of that. One is that the options market is paying for protection against an event the index market is choosing not to look at — the late-week macro calendar, or the rate auctions that come next week, or simply the accumulated distance between current levels and the last meaningful pullback. Another reading is more mechanical: dealer positioning may be holding implieds up regardless of what realized is doing. The firm does not need to choose between these. It is enough to note that the divergence exists and that, historically, divergences of this kind get resolved rather than sustained.

What today asks

The session opens into a Friday with no scheduled top-tier US data and a tape that has earned the right to consolidate. Whether it takes that right is the first question. The second is whether the early hour repeats the pattern that has defined the week — soft open, midday firming, afternoon extension — or breaks it. The third, and the one the firm will be paying most attention to, is the behavior of breadth against the behavior of the index. A tape that continues higher on narrowing participation tells a different story than one that continues higher on broadening participation, and it has been doing some of both this week without committing to either.

Rate markets will get a vote eventually. They have been polite about waiting their turn.

Trends end in one of two ways: they reverse, or they stop being trends and start being something else. The interesting work is in noticing which is happening before the label changes.

Post-close note
June 11, 2026

Post-close note — June 11, 2026

MARK'S CLOSE REPORT: A trending session that closed on its highs, with breadth confirming the move and volatility refusing to flinch.

The session closed the way it traded: with the index leaning forward and the internals leaning with it. Closing TICK printed near the upper end of its intraday range, advancers outpaced decliners through the afternoon without ever surrendering the lead, and the late tape carried the kind of one-sided character that tends to discourage second-guessing in the final hour. Volatility did not protest. The VIX drifted slightly higher into the close but remained in a range that suggests options markets are not yet treating the trend as something to insure against.

That last detail is the one worth sitting with. A market making new highs while implied volatility ticks up — even modestly — is a market in which someone is paying attention to the asymmetry. It is not panic. It is not even caution, exactly. It is the quiet purchase of optionality by participants who would rather not need it.

The shape of the day

Beneath the index, the structure was unusually clean. Trend strength readings sat well into the range typically associated with directional regimes rather than mean-reverting ones, and the spread between near- and intermediate-term moving averages widened through the session rather than compressing into the close. Price spent the day comfortably above its volume-weighted reference, and momentum oscillators reached zones that are, by any honest accounting, stretched.

Stretched is a description, not a verdict. Momentum extremes in trending regimes resolve in two ways: through time, as the underlying basis catches up, or through price, as the trend exhausts the marginal participant. Which of those resolutions is underway is rarely knowable from a single session's tape. What can be said is that the conditions for either are present, and the next several sessions will distribute weight between them.

Breadth, for its part, was supportive without being euphoric. The advance-decline reading held a healthy lead but never reached the kind of blow-off figure that sometimes marks the back end of a leg. That distinction matters. A market making highs on participation that is broad but measured behaves differently from one making highs on a narrow group of names doing all the work.

Rates as the quieter story

Treasuries did very little, and that is itself information. The ten-year sat in a tight band through the afternoon and the long end of the futures complex closed essentially unchanged from where it opened. Equity strength that does not require a corresponding rally in bonds is a different animal from equity strength that depends on it; today belonged to the former. Whether that independence persists into the rest of the week is the kind of question the next CPI print or auction calendar will answer, not this note.

The firm has been watching, across recent sessions, how often the equity bid has been arriving without an accompanying duration bid. It is becoming a feature of the regime rather than an exception. A market that can climb without help from rates is telling you something about who is doing the climbing.

A trending day asks one thing of the observer: do not confuse the smoothness of the tape for the durability of the move. They are not the same variable, and they are seldom correlated for long.

The full archive contains every published note, in reverse-chronological order.

Read the full archive →

Note ·The commentary in this section is published for general educational and informational purposes. It is not, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any commodity interest, a recommendation to enter into any trade, a description of the firm’s positions or trading activity, or personalized investment advice. Any decision to engage Hendriks Wealth Management as a Commodity Trading Advisor is made separately, on the basis of the firm’s Disclosure Document. Trading futures involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

The next step is the Disclosure Document.

Every prospective client of Hendriks Wealth Management receives the firm’s Disclosure Document before any engagement begins. It details the trading program, fee structure, risk factors, and the background of the firm and its principals. We encourage you to read it carefully.

Request the document